Dewsbury Riverside

Plan of future development at Dewsbury Riverside

Will Dewsbury Riverside make a positive contribution to the future of Dewsbury?  

Dewsbury Riverside is a major residential development planned for the south of Dewsbury and is one of the cornerstones of the North Kirklees Growth Zone - together with an industrial development at Chidswell.

The 106 page Dewsbury Riverside Delivery Framework was published recently by Miller Homes, the main developer.  Here are our first thoughts.

Where is it?  Here's the general location relative to Dewsbury Town Centre;

a map of Dewsbury Riverside relative to Dewsbury town centre

Dewsbury Riverside location relative to the Town Centre

The basis of the North Kirklees Growth Zone is that with the increased income from the additional business rates from Chidswell and the new housing bonus received from central government from the 'up to' 4,000 homes at Dewsbury Riverside the council will then be able to fund other improvements in the area. 

But first, the Local Plan for the whole of Kirklees including this development has to be approved by the government inspector, a process just entering its second phase at the time of writing, and part of that process is to demonstrate that this proposed development is desirable and achievable. 

Want the whole story?
Click the button to download the Development Framework in pdf format

We don't propose to comment on whether Dewsbury Riverside is a good or a bad thing.  There are plenty more residents who will do that  over the coming months.   The fact is that the idea has been on the planners radar for the best part of ten years so it's not going away any time soon.

The rationale behind it is that there will be additional jobs and economic activity in the short term during the construction phase - then more long term spending in North Kirklees due to the increase in population.  These are proven effects that happen when such developments take place and are to be welcomed.

Regeneration for Dewsbury?

While there is every likelihood that Dewsbury Riverside will go ahead with the consequential increase in economic activity in the area, there are numerous vague claims about the regenerating effect on Dewsbury.  But how will these claims actually convert into actions?

On page 72 there are claims that the development 'Will tackle long standing issues such as overcrowding, community cohesion, social exclusion and deprivation'.   Exactly how will this take place?  If people are living in poor quality housing in deprived areas in Dewsbury then how will be able to relocate to new housing which no matter how attractive to others who can afford it will probably be unaffordable and out of reach.

One has to conclude that this is likely to be a very diffused effect.  4,000 new homes means 4,000 homebuyers with the financial ability to actually buy a house. So we will be adding perhaps 12,000 additional population, all in a very defined geographical area.  The potential for continued separation rather than integration is very clear and the social and community aspects of the development need some careful thought.


The entire Delivery Framework document treats the development in isolation and identifies 4 'green gateways' (we're not sure but we think that means road junctions with some trees added) through which the development is reached.

The obvious route to and from Dewsbury Town Centre is along Forge Lane and then straight down Savile Road.  But to where?  Exactly the same issues of town centre access and parking will continue to exist unless the existing problems of the Town Centre are dealt with.

Later, after about 13 or 14 years and when about half or 2,000 houses have been built - so probably about 2035 - then the Dewsbury Riverside Strategic Route will be considered running from Low Mill Lane in Ravensthorpe, crossing the river and railway by a new bridge and then passing around the north edge of the site to connect to Forge Lane and Savile Road. 

Something like this:

map showing the suggested Dewsbury Riverside Strategic Route

Dewsbury Riverside Strategic Route

'Will tackle ... overcrowding, community cohesion, social exclusion and deprivation'. 

New River Calder Bridge

Now that's interesting.  For years there has been talk of an M62/M1 link road which has been fiercely resisted by some.  Any link road has to cross the river at some point.

The most recent reference to this was in the Leeds City Region Growth Fund Submission 2016 which contains the following map on page 49.

North Kirklees Orbital Route

map of A possible route for the link road contained in the Leeds City Region Growth Fund Submission 2016

A possible route for the link road contained in the Leeds City Region Growth Fund Submission 2016

It's not very clear because this map on part of a page is all that could be found.  However, it does seem to show the North Kirklees Orbital crossing the river somewhere around Scouthill or the north end of Ravensthorpe Road. 

Which is exactly where there is a 'green gateway' to Dewsbury Riverside - which is connected to the bridge along the north edge of the development.  In other words, the New River Calder Bridge is an obvious crossing point for the North Kirklees Orbital. 

The consequence of this is that the dual carriageway(?) of the North Kirklees Orbital together with all its traffic appears to run down Lees Hall Road and Ravensthorpe Road to the river before bearing left across the north edge of Dewsbury Riverside to the bridge.

Isolating the Town Centre?

Among the numerous references to the contribution that Dewsbury Riverside will make to the Town Centre, nowhere is there any reference to this strange conjunction of the 2 plans, one for the housing development from Kirklees and one for strategic roads by Leeds City Region.

The effect of a dual carriageway running directly across the access route between Dewsbury Riverside and the Town Centre is obvious.  Dewsbury has bitter experience of this with the ring road that has had such a negative effect on the town centre. 

We're not going to jump up and down saying this should not be done.  But residents need to be reassured that the planners are conscious of the problem and are going to prioritise solutions.  We don't want band aid solutions after the event. We want wholehearted solutions so that residents who choose to walk or cycle to the town centre can do so along green and pleasant routes that the plan envisages for the main development.  

Pedestrian and Cycle Routes

Similarly, there is much talk on page 58 of 'could include a cycle path' and ' cycle routes could be explored..'.

These sentences should include the words 'must' and 'will'.  To have such a major development completed without giving priority to the basic facilities that enable the health and wellbeing policy priorities of Kirklees - and fail to use the opportunity to connect up the various cycle routes that arrive in Dewsbury but do not connect effectively through it would be an opportunity lost.

To Summarise

We're not objecting to the development, the planning process will grind on through and come to a conclusion, either yes or no.  But if Dewsbury Riverside is to happen then we think connectivity to the rest of Dewsbury needs more thought.

  • check
    For the people in the community.  The development is pretty well self contained with its own local facilities.  How will it connect with the rest of our diverse communities?
  • check
    For physical movement.  Kirklees has health and wellbeing as policy priorities. Yet pedestrian and cycling access to the Town Centre and connecting to the wider area are mentioned only as a possibility - not as a design priority.
  • check
    More transparency is required regarding how the road network is affected and how this local and strategic developments like the North Kirklees Orbital work together.  Then to ensure that this major strategic development is not allowed to diminish the benefits of the local development.

What Do You Think?

Leave a comment below.  And to help give the people who live and work in Dewsbury a bigger voice then join The Dewsbury Partnership. 

Facebook Comments
  • Simon Cope says:

    My first thoughts are that this development will not go away. Kirklees Council had to include a certain quantity of new homes in the Local Plan to meet government targets. What is important is that it meets local needs. As the article above states, if the majority of homes are the usual “executive” style homes, will these help meet housing needs for the existing Dewsbury population? What needs are these? Rental properties? Private or social? What types of properties are needed?

    Secondly the impact of all these additional people on local transport has to be considered. I would imagine that most people will be car owners/drivers – what impact will this have on local traffic? What could be done to positively encourage use of public transport into/out of this new area of housing?

    Also, what leverage would we (residents/council) have to ensure the homes built are low-energy homes (i.e. far in excess of current building regulations)?

    • Bruce says:

      Thanks for your comment, Simon.
      Having waded through all 106 pages the impression I have is that there is no provision for improved traffic management until 13/14 years down the line when the Strategic Route will be developed together with the New River Calder Bridge.
      However, in general, this is only a framework document with lots of detailed planning work yet to be done. The purpose of our efforts in spreading the word is to build up a community presence that has a voice and is actively engaged in the process so that we can raise the issues you identified.

  • Rachel says:

    I am personally distraught at the prospect of losing more green space. I’m also concerned that, as you mention, getting across the Calder from one side of Dewsbury to the other is a regular bottleneck. This development will make it worse than ever, unless the hope is that everyone living there works in Wakefield or Huddersfield. So leaving several years before working on road improvements seems ridiculous.

  • Rachel Plachcinski says:

    To add to my previous comment, on reflection I think traffic issues should be identified and planned for before building takes place. For me, one of the worst things about living in Dewsbury is traffic noise and congestion. It is not a pleasant place to be.

  • Rachel says:

    And another thing – what are the regulations on the types of housing developers have to provide?

    • Bruce says:

      I believe that would be covered by the planning permission that the developer receives.
      An application has been made and approved for the first phase, quoting the Delivery Framework: “The schemes are for 120 dwellings each (240 in total) and are located at Lees Hall Road (Application Reference 2016/60/94117) and Ravensthorpe Road (Application Reference 2016/60/94118) and were granted outline planning permission on 12 April 2017. ”
      Strangely, neither of these applications can be found on the Kirklees planning search.

  • David says:

    At least surround the whole development by trees so it doesn’t become a blot on the landscape.

  • […] route taking advantage of existing footpaths and infrastructure between the new development at ​Dewsbury Riverside​​​ and Dewsbury town […]

  • >

    Like most websites, we use 'cookies' to improve your experience. By browsing our website you agree to our use of cookies. more information

    We use cookies on this website. They help us to know a little bit about you and how you use our website, which improves the browsing experience and communications - both for you and for others. They are stored locally on your computer or mobile device. To accept cookies, click the Accept button. Or go to the Privacy Policy for more information. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to the use of cookies.